701 5S. COUR
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
THOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Noricet No: NRIT9GRAN-14
On
a,
|
fap ee
=
PyCN
Gunnery Sergeant ill
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of t
United States Code, section 1552.
a
=
ct
im
ry
wv iP
@
Q
O
. BK
Qa 20
w
f the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
1 2015. Your allegations of
in accordance with
@m
!
3
am
- 3
oO
ct
K
om
ch =
error
Sls
f
Gc
cfr
Ee
=
Mm b-
Oo
Le
p-
fu
3:
a)
BP
Hn
the proceecaings
(D
o Mm u
c
oar Nn
wu
crt
bo
3
ta
"9 '
(D
QO
a
5
(D
1
i 9
a)
ra
Js
Q
1)
5
D
Wty
O ¢
3
at
go)
OO
3 O
th
>
upport t
After careful and conscientious consideration of entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERE.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon
evidence within one year from the date
of your case are such
You are entitled to have
submission of new
of the Board’s decision.
eae a ———— se eee
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11485 14
NGTON, VA 22204-2490 your application o the provisions Cc o A three-member panel Records, sitting ine L e application on 16 December 20 members of the panel will Your allegations of error and in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings material considered by the Bo 1 S together with all material su naval record, and applicable ne ae tue a a qa He wage ? we Wat — Wa eoe ame Se LY st te QO SG oO i e in eA} On b- p- a] pe tO Oo 3 Qa OQ RE oom o wy i) 3 -Orcda = Mm mn...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04589-10
4589-10 27 Sep 10 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions “ee 10, USS L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records sitting in executive session, conSidered your application on 27 a 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed n ccordance with administrative regulations and procedures able to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material ns idered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8123 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy 2. The Board, consis reviewed Petitioner's 5792 23 March 2015 and, Pf : tt mM f b- yorsp Hw 0 @ or Hs | OM & ct QQ Y Fh cr .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11957 14
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is -on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...